Network Industries and Social Welfare. The Experiment that Reshuffled European Utilities, Oxford University Press, 2013

‘Il volume Network Industries and Social Welfare è un punto di arrivo di numerosi studi compiuti negli ultimi dieci anni da Massimo Florio sui processi di privatizzazione e liberalizzazione dei servizi di interesse generale. Il lavoro offre una rilettura approfondita delle riforme compiute in oltre due decenni in Europa volta ad evidenziare come non vi sia necessaria corrispondenza fra apertura del mercato dei servizi, incremento della concorrenza e benefici per i consumatori. In questo senso l’autore rilegge criticamente la vasta letteratura in materia di network industries relativa alla stretta correlazione, costruita da molti autori, fra privatizzazione e creazione di un mercato competitivo (specialmente nei settori delle telecomunicazioni e dell’energia). To read more click here.

Allegra Canepa, Rivista della Regolazione dei mercati, Fascicolo 2, 2014.

‘Prompted by a journal referee, I gave a quick read to the book by Massimo Florio on network industries in Europe. I should have read this book before, which does not mean that I agree with everything he says. This autor had already published a critical overall analysis of the privatization experience in the UK. Along the same lines of examining broad policy experiments, he analyzes what he calls the paradigm of network industries’ policies in Europe in the last 20 years. I like books like this, that take a look at the big picture. The author had discussed with the late social-democrat thinker and historian Tony Judt about the experience of privatizing railways and utilities, something that Judt had criticized in his last years. Having that connection is a badge of honour. I sympathize with the emphasis that Florio gives to the variety of corporate forms that still exists in utilities, including state-owned firms like those in Scandinavian energy. Florio argues that the dominant paradigm in Europe was born in Margaret Thatcher’s Britain. However, the British paradigm did not include permanent regulation, as explained by Jon Stern in a paper discussing the origins of the UK reform. I am not even sure that the experiment started in the UK: USA (not only with Reagan), Chile, and other countries also experienced with various aspects of reform, not all of them good, or bad, or even finally reflected in the European experience. I also sympathize with the idea of public inetrvention in network industries encompassing a variety of objectives, which introduces caveats to the institution of independent regulation. Florio also correctly argues in my view that in the EU there is too much harmonization, but too little market integration. Still, I would not go back to state ownership monopolies, and I would have given more consideration of trade-offs, such as the one between investment commitment and short run objectives. I’ll give it a second slower read, and perhaps I’ll try to write a proper book review for a journal, if I have time. The book deserves it, and it’s supposed to be my topic‘.

Francesc Trillas, Lecturer at Applied Economics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

‘Florio (2013) challenges the dominant paradigm that liberalization of network industries in Europe in the last two decades has produced socially efficient outcomes by posing three research questions: (1) whether ownership matters for pricing and social welfare; (2) whether vertical disintegration is a condition for obtaining competitive prices; and (3) whether competition actually leads to lower prices to consumers. The author addresses these questions by assessing (a) the results of liberalization in telecommunication, electricity, and natural gas, and (b) consumers’ perception concerning quality and affordability of these services. Before answering to these questions, however, it is important to understand the European paradigm, particularly its three pillars.’ […]

Professor, Midred Warner, Department of City and Regional Planning Cornell University


[…] Two features of this book stand out. The first is the emphasis on consumer welfare in general and on poor consumers in particular. This emphasis changes the generally held perspective of economists on social surplus and makes one look at the network industry reforms quite differently. The second is that the author has answered a great challenge in empirically assessing such large-scale policy reforms. The book is well worth reading.

EEEP Volume 3, Issue 2, Book Reviews: “Network Industries and Social Welfare”, by M. Florio. Book review by Ingo Vogelsang, Boston University


[…] Network Industries and Social Welfare. The Experiment that Reshuffled European Utilities is a comprehensive volume on the regulatory reforms of the utilities in the EU and its effects on consumers, both by the detailed analysis of the author and by the multiple dimensions considered and careful argumentation of the findings. It constitutes useful reading by all researchers interested in the recent developments and current situation of public services in the EU and its regulatory paradigm. These are issues of great interest considering that they provide the basic services that affect more than 500 million citizens and potential consumers.

Network Industries and Social Welfare. The Experiment that Reshuffled European Utilities/ Julio Revuelta, Utilities Policy, Elsevier, Volume 29, June 2014


[…] Massimo Florio, con questo lavoro, fornisce una serie di elementi fattuali e di riflessioni che sollecitano un recupero di responsabilità e progettualità politica nelle public utilities europee. Network Industries and Social Welfare costituisce senza dubbio una lettura essenziale per chiunque sia interessato alla riforma e alla regolazione dei servizi pubblici e per chi abbia a cuore la questione della cittadinanza nell’Unione Europea.

QA Rivista dell’associazione Rossi-Doria, Numero 1-2014, pp-171-175, recensione di Roberto Pedersini

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: buy backlinks | Thanks to webdesign berlin, House Plans and voucher codes